Public bug report changed: https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/6472
Comment: Hey Reinhard, On Tuesday 24 January 2006 16:00, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > Public bug report changed: > https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/6472 > > Comment: > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 02:05:19PM -0000, Tor Harald Thorland wrote: > > Heres the text from the GTK-Gnutella page: > > > > --snip-- > > What does "Outdated version, please upgrade" mean? > > Versions of gtk-gnutella more than one year old are banned, since they > > lack features that are important to the rapidly evolving gnet's health > > and scalability. In addition, unstable versions are banned after 90 days. > > --snip-- > > > > So a beta version is about to expire 22 of January. Nothing to do with > > it until they release a new version, unless you get a version from cvs. > > Thank you for your investigation. If I understand correctly, there > isn't much we can do, but to wait for a new upstream version. If I read > correctly, the 0.9.5 release has expired as well, so there is no > working release at all at the moment. Is this right? > > I'm not feeling comfortable in uploading a random cvs snapshot. I > consider this as the last resort. > > Please keep us updated on this bug. If debian doesn't have a new version, and real upstream is not responding anymore, we shouldn't break UVF for a very questionable package like gtk-gnutella. My POV :) \sh -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
