Confirmed. I agree that if we don't want to include 64-bit Flash yet it's better not to include it at all. Experienced user will find a way to get it and inexperienced one *shouldn't* use this emulated 32-bit version as it works lower than any acceptable standards. I couldn't scroll videos from YouTube, sometimes it hangs completely etc. etc.
32-bit Flash should be erased from 64-bit Karmic - this is my point. Maybe an acceptable solution would be to make Firefox point to the proper Adobe labs site (when there is a Flash needed) containing 64-bit Flash download so that users could at least download it themselves without searching Google through? This is what I'm talking about: http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10.html Firefox could also advise where to unpack the library file. -- Please package flashplugin 64bit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326555 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
