One more suggestion: Don't name the trash command "trash-file" unless there are absolutely compulsory reasons for it. My arguments against "trash-file": * It is not intuitive and therefore unnecessarily difficult to memorise. * It is unnecessarily long. * Every change in the name of programs causes confusion, so the new solution should be a clear improvement (which it isn't). * It is even wrong: Directories can be trashed, too.
Just "trash" was much better. However, I welcome the renaming of "restore-trash" to "trash-restore", "list-trash" to "trash-list" etc. This is intuitive and allows the user to look for the appropriate command with the tab key. -- restore-trash crashes if the original path does not exist (even if it's in the same trash can) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/310088 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
