** Description changed: - To provide proper integration with ubufox, plugins should also put a - link for their binary in + To provide proper integration with ubufox, + + 1. plugins that use update-alternatives mechanism should also put a link + for their binary in /usr/share/ubufox/plugins/ and touch all /usr/lib/firefox-3.*/.autoreg that exist in .postinst. - Also please add the Description and Filename header to your binary - package, like gnash: + 2. All plugins should have a Description and Filename header added to + the binary package control, like gnash: Xb-Npp-Description: The GNU SWF Player (http://www.gnu.org/software/gnash/) Xb-Npp-File: libgnashplugin.so -------- When encountering a java plugin Firefox offers a confusing dialog: it gives two options: 1. "GCJ Web Browser Plugin" 2. "The GCJ Web Browser Plugin" the second options supposedly uses openjdk. No descriptions are given whatsoever.
** Attachment added: "totem fix" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22499081/totem.debdiff ** Changed in: totem (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection dialog) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272010 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs