It was kerneloops that claimed it was locked! I am of the belief that it was just a busy process that was seen to be locked!
As it claimed to be a bug, hence the reason I submitted it... On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 03:59 +0000, Scott Kitterman wrote: > why do you think it's locked and not just still busy? > Scott Evans VK7HSE Phone: +61362291658 Mobile: +61417586157 Skype: vk7hse sc...@vk7hse.hobby-site.org http://www.vk7hse.hobby-site.org PGP/GPG Key ID 74639624 -- This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. ** Attachment added: "UbuntuStrapLogo.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25691381/UbuntuStrapLogo.png -- BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 61s! [clamscan:4198] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363200 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
