JackOfAll wrote: > Thanks for the feedback. That's not a bad start, at least 96k works. We > might be able to use different divisors for the higher rates. (And to be > honest I had zero expectation that 176k4 or 192k would output anything > at all. ;)) > > EDIT: I'll also upload my sample rate test files to the web server > later. It's only a file from the Bink Audio Test CD, (this is the right > channel, this is the left channel, this is both channels), at 32k, 44k1, > 48k, 88k2, 96k, 176k4, 192k, 352k8, and 384k. (Someone might need to jog > my memory, if I forget.)
Okay. Let me know if you need me to test anything else. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Pascal Hibon's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7969 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=98544 _______________________________________________ unix mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/unix
