> For an opaque window, yes, I see slightly faster compositing. For a > translucent window I can't tell the difference. For a translucent > image over a translucent image, thousands is clearly slower.
Well, I've found something that's clearly faster in thousands than millions, but it's not something I use all that often: video. The difference there is astounding. And that makes sense, because the frames aren't being pre-rendered do it's not re-dithering them when it does compositing. Also, I've been doing some more digging, and it looks like the PCI bus on the 7x00 is a problem. I've seen figures as low as 17 MB/s quoted for PCI bus benchmarks. :-P -- Unsupported OS X is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html> Unsupported OS X list info <http://lowendmac.com/lists/unsupported.html> --> AOL users, remove "mailto:"; Send list messages to: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Archive <http://www.mail-archive.com/unsupportedosx%40mail.maclaunch.com/> Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com
