Gary Fowler wrote: > I would like to use unxsbind in a enterprise environment. Editing the > local.h each I deploy a new version is not really good for me. > > I see reference in much of the code to USECONF; and I see in older > versions of local.h, an example of this feature. > > Is the use of an external conf file still usable? Was is ever usable? > > If usable, can it be made the default to ease deployment of newer > versions via the yum repo? > > Perhaps there is some better way, that I'm not seeing? >
This is very requested option. And as Gary Fowler mentions it was supported and exists somewhere in old repository versions. It does slow down things a bit versus compiled in db settings. (Note that both the local.h and the external configuration methods have security implications, though different.) I will address this as soon as possible. Thanks to all for your interest in this project. For 2010 we plan to introduce new javascript interfaces, dhcp, dnssec and more IP address space management features to make unxsBind the FOSS alternative to the proprietary Infoblox products and appliances. Gary Wallis _______________________________________________ unxsBind mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openisp.net/mailman/listinfo/unxsbind
