So long as you inherit or instantiate your new objects within the scope of
your current object (Database) you should be fine. Including files just
makes them available if you want to use them.
--Will
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Nathan Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> No, you're right - I realized that as I was typing it into PDT. I can't
> see
> any way to implement nested classes obviously right now. PHP.net doesn't
> supply any examples. I want to have classes I call adapters to communicate
> transparently between "queries" and "databases", and I'm starting at the
> database end. Anyway, so since I can't use nested classes, I just decided
> to
> structure everything a little bit differently:
>
> Database.php
> -- require_once('exceptions/exceptions.php');
> -- include('FunctionNotImplementedException.php');
> -- require_once('adapters/adapters.php');
> -- include('SqlAdapter.php');
> -- include('XmlAdapter.php');
>
> Do I look like I'm starting well? I expect everything that is "include"d
> in
> the exceptions.php and adapters.php to be readily available to
> Database.php.
> Or is my understanding of inheritance incorrect?
>
> Nathan
>
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Roberto Mello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > But the code posted by Craig doesn't give you a function pointer.
> > Database.xmlAdapter will just be an instance of XMLAdapter, not a
> > function pointer. Or were you referring to something else?
> >
> > Roberto
> >
>
> --
> Nathan Lane
> Home, http://www.nathandelane.com
> Blog, http://nathandelane.blogspot.com
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> UPHPU mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://uphpu.org/mailman/listinfo/uphpu
> IRC: #uphpu on irc.freenode.net
>
_______________________________________________
UPHPU mailing list
[email protected]
http://uphpu.org/mailman/listinfo/uphpu
IRC: #uphpu on irc.freenode.net
