On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Velda <[email protected]> wrote: > I have to think that's some of the logic behind HTML5 actually, but > while it's easier in some ways, it could be very limiting in other > ways. I guess if you're working within templates though limits are to > be expected, so it might be smart for a template site to consider that > kind of schema.
Obviously not every site would have requirements that match up perfectly with the standard set of objects, but having them in use would still simplify things because you could tell your graphic designer "this site complies with the Foo standard, plus these three items." You could also have Foo.1, Foo.2, Foo.3 for one, two and three column layouts, etc. -Dan _______________________________________________ UPHPU mailing list [email protected] http://uphpu.org/mailman/listinfo/uphpu IRC: #uphpu on irc.freenode.net
