On 2 Feb 2010, at 10:13, Scott Hill wrote: > On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Wade Preston Shearer < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> On 28 Jan 2010, at 3:02, Daniel C. wrote: >> >> I'm not going to do it. I had just ran across it in a forum while >> searching >> for a solution and was wondering what the ramifications would be. I >> ran a >> few tests and it actually introduced more issues in my code than it >> resolved. I am taking a difference approach. > > What was the other approach? Would you mind sharing what you ended up > doing? > > I'm curious because the same thing (or something similar) has > happened to me > before.
The code is part of a templating engine in a framework. There are snippets of code that get processed inside other snippets of code. I was trying to restrict the scope such that each snippet would be processed individually and variables would be sandboxed. I simply dropped this requirement. _______________________________________________ UPHPU mailing list [email protected] http://uphpu.org/mailman/listinfo/uphpu IRC: #uphpu on irc.freenode.net
