On 15 Feb 2011, at 21:13, Chad Sollis wrote: > I've seen a lot of CMS and seen roll outs of all kinds. I think a live site, > with varying status, and a launch tool to trigger status across the > mechanisms would be the best and least pron to error.
How would you test the changes before you roll them out? How would you handle things like navigation without having to duplicate the entire tree? _______________________________________________ UPHPU mailing list [email protected] http://uphpu.org/mailman/listinfo/uphpu IRC: #uphpu on irc.freenode.net
