One (strong) argument for it is that it's better to have people accidentally post something meant for the list to the sender only than accidentally post something private to the list, especially since the first situation is easily correctable, and the 2nd is not.
Thanks, Mac On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Aaron Luman <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jun 1, 2011, at 9:33 AM, Brian J. Rogers wrote: > > > I feel like an idiot every time I forget to use 'Reply All' to get the > > mailing list address as the recipient. > > > I have always wondered why the list server sets the "reply-to" as the > sender and not the list. Is there anyone on here who can explain that? > > _______________________________________________ > > UPHPU mailing list > [email protected] > http://uphpu.org/mailman/listinfo/uphpu > IRC: #uphpu on irc.freenode.net > -- Mac Newbold [email protected] 801-694-6334 <http://www.codegreene.com> _______________________________________________ UPHPU mailing list [email protected] http://uphpu.org/mailman/listinfo/uphpu IRC: #uphpu on irc.freenode.net
