Hi
Aside the points Adam mentioned, I would add that while Links is fine
to tinker with, it is not production ready (in my opinion):
- at the moment the database credentials are displayed in-the-clear in
the HTML
- I don't think it's in active development anymore (it wasn't a few
months ago when I talked to Ezra Cooper)
- it's slow (CGI + interpreted) compared to Ur/Web
This might matter to you, depending on what you're up to (I know it
does for me, if I develop something, I want to deploy it and use it)
Manu
On 15 Sep 2009, at 16:05, Adam Chlipala wrote:
nitralime wrote:
**As I have already mentioned in my other post
I am aware of two other functional web frameworks
(HOP and Links) which in my opinion provide
a similar "functionality" as Ur/Web!
I'm just curious about how Ur/Web compares to these frameworks!
There are many "incidental" differences, but I believe these points
distinguish Ur/Web most clearly:
* Non-trivial type-level computation, which enables more expressive
statically-typed metaprogramming
* Standard abstraction features from the typed FP world, including
modules and type classes
_______________________________________________
Ur mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.impredicative.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ur
_______________________________________________
Ur mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.impredicative.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ur
