> Can't you implement it as an FFI library, so that folks know when they're > explicitly including it? I consider it a feature, not a bug, to make this > functionality a little hard to implement or include. ;)
OK, l'll rewrite it as a blessScript function. Looks like it is really the best solution for the moment. And here I have a question about nested libraries. Does Ur/Web handle situation where several libraries (A,B,C) uses same library D (all three have `library D' directive) and the master project includes them all (A,B,C and D)? For example, when I make BlessScript.urp, I will want to use it in both uru library (currently, uru is not a library, but a set of *urs, but I plan to turn it into libray) and in master project. Will I be able to do it by simply listing BlessScript in both Uru.urp and App.urp? > Do you have a suggestion of good places to link to publicize such tools on > the Ur project site? Sure, I think it would be nice to place the link under the http://www.impredicative.com/wiki/index.php/Libraries_and_FFI_bindings (I plan to turn uru into a library) but wiki also has http://www.impredicative.com/wiki/index.php/Ur-based_Projects which also match. Since both pages contains not too much items, what do you think about merging them into one page? Also, since it is one of the first thing user wants from wiki (at least , it was so for me), what do you think about moving all the links from both pages to the main wiki page to a separate section below others? Also, I have a problem with NivoSlider control, since it requires $(window).load() event handler, and <body onload=..> happens too early. Authors suggest using <script> $(window).load(function() { ... nivo_slider_init(); .. }); </script> So I used an ugly hack. I can wrap it in FFI together with blessScript, but just in case I miss something: Do we have a better way of calling things like this right now? Regards, Sergey PS Just noticed that blessScript is not the best name, because the function wouldn't have corresponding compiler-side blesser. But what do you think about introducing `allow script' directive? I probably can handle it if it is not that hard. _______________________________________________ Ur mailing list [email protected] http://www.impredicative.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ur
