On Thu, 06 Apr 2017 17:25:53 -0400, Adam Chlipala wrote: > > On 04/06/2017 04:52 PM, Benjamin Barenblat wrote: > > In addition, on your first TODO (‘use better crypto functions’), you > > may be interested in my cryptographic random¹ and hash² libraries. I’d > > be thrilled to incorporate patches for the latter if you want to add > > more OpenSSL hash functions (PBKDF2 in particular would be extremely > > welcome and probably quite applicable to your current work). > > > > ¹ https://benjamin.barenblat.name/git/urweb-crypto-random-openssl.git > > ² https://benjamin.barenblat.name/git/urweb-crypto-hash-openssl.git > > I thought Ur/Web's built-in [rand] function was already cryptographically > secure. Did I > get something wrong there?
It's the crypt function that I'm concerned about.
pgphqtFjrHt1Z.pgp
Description: OpenPGP Digital Signature
_______________________________________________ Ur mailing list [email protected] http://www.impredicative.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ur
