> I sent this patch in last July, but got no response yet. So let me try > it again. The below description the patch are same as my last July post.
Sorry I missed this one. > Is it OK? Looks ok from my point of view. It might flush redundantly for an empty send buffer if len is larger than URJ_USBCONN_FTDX_MAXSEND. But that's tolerated anyway in usbconn_ftdi_flush(). Could you please add the same in libftd2xx.c? Thanks! Arnim ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com _______________________________________________ UrJTAG-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development
