On Wednesday 03 February 2010 03:12:51 Jie Zhang wrote:
> On 02/03/2010 03:45 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > anyone mind if i enable quiet build support via automake ?  it requires
> > automake-1.11 to have support enabled, but if you have older automake,
> > the default behavior is unchanged from today.
> >
> > the quiet output makes it a lot easier to notice warnings and such during
> > the build.  an example:
> 
> The quiet build mode is one thing I don't like when working on Linux
> kernel and uClibc. It's inconvenient to redo the make with V=1 every
> time I want to see the command line.

as the referenced documentation explains, you can disable it at configure 
time.  so you only need to do it once ... every `make` after that will follow 
the configured default.

> It hides the command line, it also
> hides the command options. It occurred several times that I didn't
> notice some important options were missing or weird options were added.
> I usually do build in Emacs, so it's very easy to notice any warnings
> and errors. Even with quiet mode, you have to look at the screen while
> building to notice warnings or errors. It doesn't help much for me when
> building large things since I usually switch to other stuff while building.

i guess i cant multitask as well as you ;).  i use multiple windows in screen 
to keep all the output readily available.
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business
Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts
Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com
_______________________________________________
UrJTAG-development mailing list
UrJTAG-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development

Reply via email to