On 02/05/2010 04:19 PM, Jie Zhang wrote: > I compared UrJTAG from latest svn trunk + my two uncommitted patches on > mailing list with the one in our local repository, I found about 17% > performance drop when loading Linux kernel with gdbproxy with gnICE+ > cable. Our local jtag was based on r1120, which is very very old. I > compared FT2232 commands in both cases but they are same. Does anyone > see the same issue? > Never mind. It seems related to my ThinkPad T61. On my Dell Optiplex 780, two versions of UrJTAG has the same performance. The performance on T61 is about half of the performance on Dell PC. So I will disregard this issue. Sorry for the noise.
Jie ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com _______________________________________________ UrJTAG-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development
