On Tuesday, August 24, 2010 07:28:01 Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > As suggested by Mike. > Measurement showed a substantial performance gain > As open/read/write/close is Posix it is still quite portable > > We have discussed this before. The gain then seemed so small that it was > not worthwhile, but a retest showed differently. > Loading a 2.4 MB file in my board used to take between 1.58 and 1.59 min > with this patch the same file takes between 1.12 and 1.13 min.
is this any different from the patch i posted previously, other than the lseek() change to the get_value function ? -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Sell apps to millions through the Intel(R) Atom(Tm) Developer Program Be part of this innovative community and reach millions of netbook users worldwide. Take advantage of special opportunities to increase revenue and speed time-to-market. Join now, and jumpstart your future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-atom-d2d
_______________________________________________ UrJTAG-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development
