On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 09:18, Peter Budny wrote: > When trying to compile UrJTAG with ftd2xx support, it fails to link the > executables. This seems to be because @FTD2XXLIB@ is being added to > liburjtag_la_LIBADD in src/Makefile.am (where it does not help define any > symbols) instead of jtag_LDADD in src/apps/jtag/Makefile.am (where the EXE > is linked).
libtool should look at all the libraries encoded in liburjtag.la and pull them in as needed when linking jtag since jtag depends on the .la file. so what you describe does not sound incorrect, but expected behavior. otherwise, the change you're proposing would break shared library creation as it is liburjtag that is using FTDI symbols and not the jtag app. > However, I tried editing the Makefile.am’s, reconfiguring and making, and > that fails because libtool turns i'm interested in what the original code looked like, not what your hacked up version is doing -mike ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c1 _______________________________________________ UrJTAG-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development
