On Tuesday, June 28, 2011 10:26:35 Jie Zhang wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 09:29, Jie Zhang wrote:
> >> [Resend with a smaller patch. The original patch email is pending for
> >> list moderator's approval because the size exceeding 100KB. I don't
> >> know when the moderator will see it. So I resend it with a smaller
> >> patch with trivial stuff removed.]
> > 
> > i can add you to said list if you want
> 
> I would like to see this limit to be relaxed or removed. I have
> encountered this limit for several times. I also saw others
> encountered this limit in the past.

i'd rather not.  people sometimes hit this limit because they're doing 
something wrong.  i certainly dont want to see an e-mail of 1MiB+ data files 
coming across the list (this has come up before).

i added myself to the notification list when things get moderated, so 
hopefully things will get processed quicker now.

> >> It also move libiberty
> >> headers from src/lib/ to include/. So if source file in UrJTAG want to
> >> use functions from libiberty, it can just include libiberty.h and
> >> don't need to declare the function by itself. This is also how GCC,
> >> GDB and Binutils use libiberty.
> > 
> > i wonder if we should have it be include/lib/ and then have the
> > toplevel code take care of putting -I$(top_srcdir)/include/lib.
> 
> I thought about it. But I'm not sure which one is better: put those
> headers in include/lib/ or just in include/. So I just choose the less
> effort one.

i just didnt want clogging up of include/.  but i guess it's not that big of a 
deal.

as long as the default case expands into the const lookup table, this looks 
fine to me.
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security 
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes 
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________
UrJTAG-development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development

Reply via email to