On Wednesday, June 29, 2011 13:53:37 Jie Zhang wrote: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:41 PM, Mike Frysinger <[email protected]> wrote: > > in looking at this code, i wonder why ice_hex_init() exists. shouldnt > > hex.c:hex_init() have this logic ? > > I'm not sure why hex_init does not have this logic. My guess is it's > not all users of hex_value need this logic. For example, gcc calls > hex_init directly but some BFD files call it with such a wrapper. It > happens to us that we'd better have such a wrapper such that when you > updating firmware for multiple ICE-100B cables in one UrJTAG session > hex_init is only called once.
lets move the logic into our hex_init() so we dont have to duplicate it across other pieces of urjtag (and they'd still be wrong) -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________ UrJTAG-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development
