On Sunday 05 August 2012 01:06:29 Elden Tyrell wrote:
> On Aug 3, 2012, at 11:33 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > try this version
> 
> The patch appears to have gotten mangled (maybe try sending as an
> attachment?), so I couldn't try it, but it looks good.  Will you apply it
> to SVN?

if it works for you, then i can commit it

> Here's the [first] part that patch didn't like:
> > #include <urjtag/cmd.h>
> > @@ -58,6 +59,14 @@ cmd_pod_run (urj_chain_t *chain, char *p
> > 
> >     for (j = 1; j < i; j++)
> 
> Notice the line ending after "char* p"...

that is correct.  the @@ provides context, not an actual change.
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
UrJTAG-development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development

Reply via email to