On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 06:23:47PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 11:01:09PM +0100, Kolja Waschk wrote: > > > I am testing Travis with GitHub, that is a well integrated build test > > > automation, that triggers Travis build tests on git push. > > > > I agree that UrJTAG would really benefit from continuous > > testing/integration. Especially these various bits about this or that > > Cygwin/MinGW detail that are easily missed if you don't always check > > compilation on each platform. > > CI is nice indeed. > > What it takes to let Continuous Integration also do Cygwin/MinGW > is unknown to me. > > Right now we, the people who care about urjtag, > should _not_ make CI a blocking issue.
And whoever wants to play with whatever CI tooling is very welcome to do so. Groeten Geert Stappers -- Leven en laten leven ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ UrJTAG-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development
