On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 09:11:14PM +0200, Jan Willeke wrote:
> Geert Stappers hat am 11. Mai 2017 um 23:53 geschrieben:
> > On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 11:17:39PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > > >
> > > >  [ ... patch from Jan Willeke ... ]
> > > >
> > > I think that I understand what the change in the code does.
> > > It is the compaion text on the code change that makes
> > > me hesiate to apply the patch.
> > > To be continued.
> > Rewrite proposal of companion text:
> > enumerated GPIO_REQUIRED blocks using pin 4
> > GPIO_REQUIRED was used for two things: "last" and "unset"
> > Last pin can be a valid pin.
> > "unset" should be a separate value.
> > sign of by Jan Willeke so he gets the credits
> > @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
> > /* pin mapping */
> > enum {
> >     * GPIO_UNSET = -1,
> >       GPIO_TDI = 0,
> >       GPIO_TCK,
> >       GPIO_TMS,
> 
> Hi Geert,
> 
> Thanks for rewriting the companion text and putting the -1 into the enum.
> I fully agree with your changes.

I did read that as: Mix it and apply it to our git repo

So, I did    :-)


Groeten
Geert Stappers
-- 
Leven en laten leven

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
UrJTAG-development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development

Reply via email to