On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 8:50 PM, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > 2008/12/20 David Nielsen <[email protected]>: > > > > > > 2008/12/20 Mark <[email protected]> > >> > >> > >> And for this entire issue where i made this thread for in the first > >> place. Don't expect me to be silent now. I will be vocal about this. > >> fedora has a "freedom" sign in it's logo so make that a reality! > > > > And you remain with the freedom to change the setting manually, create > your > > own spin with the setting changed by default. Your freedom however does > not > > extend to throwing a hissy fit on the development list because you're > > preference is not the default. We have processes for feature goals and > there > > is upstream GNOME to have this debate with, both will get you input on > the > > idea without pissing the rest of us off. > > > > I used to have the browser mode activated out of habit, but now because > you > > made it your mission to spam the devel list and attack developers, I have > > changed the setting back and you know what.. I love spatial. > > Good for you. > > > > - David > > Then i will, especially for you, explain why i included those 2 other > lists (3 in total now) > > fodora-general list > ------------------------- > this list is included because this concerns the general fedora public > and to give it a more then just developer attention > > fedora-devel list > ------------------------- > this list is included because is where "features" for new fedora > released belong. if you want it or not this thread belongs there as > well. > > gnome usability list > ------------------------- > it is a setting in nautilus that i want to see with a different > default value and it affects the usability (in a positive way) for > gnome so that's why i included this list > > and i had: nautilus list > ----------------------------- > I first had this list included as well but somewhere it got dropped of > by someone.. don't know who or why and doesn't matter much. changes in > nautilus need to be in that list so this message does belong there as > well. > > And if this pisses you off, this really valid discussion, then you > probably just need to pass it.
Calm down. As Olav mentioned in his email, there's one- and only one- way to properly solve this, and that's a usability study. I don't know if anyone has done a study in the past, but "I think users like it my way better" can only get so far. [1] > > > To all other ppl. please keep the usability list included since this > really is something they should be aware of. > _______________________________________________ > Usability mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability > -Natan [1] Yes, I know I made a similar comment above, not realizing how passionate the conversation already was. As far as I can now tell, it doesn't seem like tallying up opinions will help with this.
_______________________________________________ Usability mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability
