On 20 May 2011, at 15:45, Keith Clarke wrote: > It's probably about differences in 'brain-wiring' but I find that level of > abstraction too difficult, when learning new concepts, training others or > (the real purpose for my map) deciding where to hang the various lumps of > code for my MVC application architecture.
It's not really an abstraction to me, because all I need to think is of the "flow". So the messages go up trough all the stations, unless they're "trapped" by a handler. Besides then executing, that handler can even choose to pass the message on (pass myMessage), to continue the "flow". > > So, my map is based on a slightly more concrete 'object-level' model, where > the message flows involve only those classes that have been instantiated. See, that confuses me, because there's no instatiating happening. An object/card/whatever script either is in the path or not, thats how it is to me. > I will update the map to show message flows through both 'container classes' > and 'instantiated objects'. That way, I should be able to confuse all of the > people, all of the time! Maybe a Saturday evening presentation - now there's > a threat ;-) I'll write you down for the Saturday in a week, ok? Björnke -- official ChatRev page: http://bjoernke.com/chatrev Chat with other RunRev developers: go stack URL "http://bjoernke.com/chatrev/chatrev1.3b3.rev"; _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
