On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 12:30 PM Brian Milby via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> > One area where I prefer binary stacks is plugins. It seems cleaner to > keep the code self contained inside the IDE. I actually consolidate > Navigator to a single binary file on my systems and do not notice anything > different in operation. > I prefer binary stacks for plugins as well. I'll offer up one approach I have been experimenting with recently for a plugin developed using Levure. While I develop the plugin in Levure, I package it up into a single binary stack for distribution. Aside from the benefits of tracking development changes using Script only stacks, I like that I never have to worry about whether or not I've exported/imported scripts and that I only create the binary version when I'm ready to release. The repo can be found here: https://github.com/trevordevore/bakers-assistant The script that creates the binary stack for distribution can be found here: https://github.com/trevordevore/bakers-assistant/blob/master/app/package%20bakers%20assistant.livecodescript -- Trevor DeVore ScreenSteps www.screensteps.com _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode