Thank you for your thoughts. I don’t think the ad checkbox would have been
checked. (It isn’t checked now and since I was only vaguely aware of its
existence, it seems unlikely I would have checked - and then unchecked it -
accidentally.
When opening the android apk with BBEdit, I found the text below (ad checkbox
not ticked and builds from both LC 9.6.0 and 9.6.1 (rc1) contained this
string.) I am not knowledgeable enough to know if this really has anything to
do with the advertising SDK. The new "Families Policy Requirements” has a
list of allowed ad SDKs (when targeting an app for children) so it may be that
Google Play is now implementing an automated check for ad references and that
something that normally got through is now triggering this alert. Does that
sound possible? Not sure whether to submit again to Google Play or create a bug
report.
——————————————————————
+$SWITCH_TABLE$android$net$NetworkInfo$State A$SWITCH_TABLE$com$inneractive$api$ads$InneractiveAdView$ViewState 4$SwitchMap$com$amazon$inapp$purchasing$Item$ItemType G$SwitchMap$com$amazon$inapp$purchasing$KiwiResponseHandler$ResponseType M$SwitchMap$com$amazon$inapp$purchasing$PurchaseResponse$PurchaseRequestStatus [$SwitchMap$com$amazon$inapp$purchasing$PurchaseUpdatesResponse$PurchaseUpdatesRequestStatus $VALUES $assertionsDisabled
%d,%d,%d,%d %s < %d %s < %d AND NOT %s %s =
%d &a= &cid= &eid= &g= &h= &hid= &k= &lg= &mn= &nt=3G &nt=WIFI &osudi= &po= &t= &v= &w= '
AND ' can't be consumed. ', ( A(%s, requestId: "%s",
getUserIdRequestStatus: "%s", userId: "%s") U(%s, requestId: "%s",
itemDataRequestStatus: "%s", unavailableSkus: %s, itemData: %s) M(%s,
requestId: "%s", purchaseRequestStatus: "%s", userId: "%s", receipt: %s) Ç(%s,
requestId: "%s", purchaseUpdatesRequestStatus: "%s", userId: "%s", receipts:
%s, revokedSkus: %s, offset: "%s", isMore: "%b") L(%s, sku: "%s", itemType:
"%s", subscriptionPeriod: %s, purchaseToken: "%s") `(%s, sku: "%s", price:
"%s", itemType: "%s", title: "%s", description: "%s", smallIconUrl: "%s") $(%s,
startDate: "%s", endDate:
"%s") () ()V D(?i)((?:http|https|file):\/\/|(?:inline|data|about|javascript):)(.*) (TTleft;TTright;)V (Z
(decimal) ) ") because another async operation( ) is in
progress. ): ): IAB helper is not set up. )I )V )Z * **** Error:
*. */* , ,
, height:
, item type: , purchase:
, result: , since you don't own it! , token: , type is : ,
width: , y: - -1 . . No token. . Request code: . Response: .0 .3
.AppReceiver .fileprovider/share .jpg
.mblandroid / /* /I /android_asset 00 02 ¥0:OK/-1001:Remote exception
during initialization/-1002:Bad response received/-1003:Purchase signature
verification failed/-1004:Send intent failed/-1005:User cancelled/-1006:Unknown
purchase response/-1007:Missing token/-1008:Unknown error/-1009:Subscriptions
not available/-1010:Invalid consumption attempt á0:OK/1:User
Canceled/2:Unknown/3:Billing Unavailable/4:Item unavailable/5:Developer
Error/6:Error/7:Item Already Owned/8:Item not owned
——————————————————————
—
Scott Morrow
Elementary Software
> On Jul 30, 2020, at 11:20 AM, JeeJeeStudio via use-livecode
> <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>
> Yes, that was what i was thinking too. Else it would not get into the
> standalone.
>
> Op 30-7-2020 om 19:18 schreef J. Landman Gay via use-livecode:
>> I've never seen that. Did you accidentally tick the ads checkbox in
>> standalone settings?
>>
>> --
>> Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
>> HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
>> On July 30, 2020 12:29:00 AM scott--- via use-livecode
>> <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I have an app (Windows, Mac, iOS and Android… thank you LC!) that is aimed
>>> at children. It does not contain advertising. I recently submitted an
>>> update to Google Play and although it was accepted into the store a few
>>> weeks ago, today I received the notice below. I am suspicious that this is
>>> not currently addressed by LC. Has anyone else encountered this and if so
>>> how was it solved?
>>>
>>> —————————————————
>>> — from Google Play—
>>> —————————————————
>>> Hi Developers at Elementary Software, After a recent review, we found
>>> that your app Terrific Triangle (com.elementarysoftware.terrifictriangle)
>>> is not compliant with one or more of our Developer Program Policies. Please
>>> resolve the issue within 30 days of the issuance of this notification or
>>> your app will be removed from Google Play.
>>>
>>> Issue with your app
>>> We have detected that your app includes non-certified ad SDKs or SDKs that
>>> are not approved for use in child-directed services.
>>>
>>> About the Families Policy Requirements
>>> Any SDKs used in the app must be appropriate for use in child-directed
>>> services. Additionally, apps that solely target children must not contain
>>> any SDKs that are not approved for use in child-directed services,
>>> including ads SDKs. Apps in the Designed for Families program must only use
>>> ad SDKs that have certified their compliance with the Families Ads Program
>>> <https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-developer/answer/9283445>.
>>> —————————————————
>>>
>>>
>>> Scott Morrow
>>>
>>> Elementary Software
>>> (Now with 20% less chalk dust!)
>>> web https://elementarysoftware.com/
>>> email sc...@elementarysoftware.com
>>> ------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
