> Am 21.06.2022 um 11:56 schrieb Mark Waddingham via use-livecode > <[email protected]>: > > On 2022-06-20 20:55, matthias rebbe via use-livecode wrote: >> Anyway, the macOS Apple support is currently experimental, i am pretty >> sure there will be such an option in future. At least i hope so. ;) > > Why? > First, it's more convenient for the developer. The Intel only and Apple only builds are smaller ins size than the universal build. So if i want to build those single platform apps to offer the smaller sized apps i have to run the standalone building process twice, right? And before i run the 2nd build process i even have to switch the settings, right? That's not very convenient. And for those who want to build an universal app an "universal" option in the standalone settings would be great. And btw why did this option exist in previous LC versions for an Universal app with PPC and Intel support? Regards, Matthias > The idea of universal binaries is to ensure that a single app/installer can > be shipped to users and that will then use the 'best' it can for their > machine. They provide a much better end-user experience than Windows or Linux > provide in this regard. > > Whilst you might not have many users using Apple architecture machines right > now, you don't know when they might upgrade, so universal binaries mean that > when a user upgrades their machine, their apps they already have (backed up, > more than likely, and re-imaged on the new machine) will continue to take > advantage of their hardware. > > Warmest Regards, > > Mark. > > P.S. I should point out that Apple architecture support *is* experimental, so > its fine to include and seed to users for testing purposes, but I wouldn't > include one in final shipping releases just yet. > > P.P.S. That being said, the only Apple architecture related bug we have had > reported recently is related to standalone building itself (and is related to > macOS High Sierra - 10.13 - and below *not* supported arm64 slices in some of > the command-line tools the S/B uses) - and I fully expect the experimental > tag to be removed by final release of 10 (and the corresponding 9.6.x > maintenance release just after that). > > -- > Mark Waddingham ~ [email protected] ~ http://www.livecode.com/ > LiveCode: Everyone can create apps > > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > [email protected] > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
Re: M1 Macs and LC 9.6.8 RCs and 10.0.0 RCs
matthias rebbe via use-livecode Tue, 21 Jun 2022 04:20:13 -0700
- M1 Macs and LC 9.6.8 RCs and 10.0.0 RC... Niggemann, Bernd via use-livecode
- Re: M1 Macs and LC 9.6.8 RCs and ... Matthias Rebbe via use-livecode
- Re: M1 Macs and LC 9.6.8 RCs and ... Niggemann, Bernd via use-livecode
- Re: M1 Macs and LC 9.6.8 RCs ... matthias rebbe via use-livecode
- Re: M1 Macs and LC 9.6.8 ... Mark Waddingham via use-livecode
- Re: M1 Macs and LC 9.... Richmond via use-livecode
- Re: M1 Macs and LC 9.6.8 RCs and ... Niggemann, Bernd via use-livecode
- Re: M1 Macs and LC 9.6.8 RCs ... Richmond Mathewson via use-livecode
- Re: M1 Macs and LC 9.6.8 RCs ... matthias rebbe via use-livecode
- Re: M1 Macs and LC 9.6.8 ... Mark Waddingham via use-livecode
- Re: M1 Macs and LC 9.... matthias rebbe via use-livecode
- Re: M1 Macs and ... Mark Waddingham via use-livecode
- Re: M1 Macs ... matthias rebbe via use-livecode
