> Am 21.06.2022 um 11:56 schrieb Mark Waddingham via use-livecode 
> <[email protected]>:
> 
> On 2022-06-20 20:55, matthias rebbe via use-livecode wrote:
>> Anyway, the macOS Apple support is currently experimental, i am pretty
>> sure there will be such an option in future. At least i hope so. ;)
> 
> Why?
> 

First, it's more convenient for the developer.

The Intel only and Apple only builds are smaller ins size than the universal 
build.

So if i want to build those single platform apps to offer the smaller sized 
apps  i have to run the standalone building process twice, right? And before i 
run the 2nd build process i even have to switch the settings, right?
That's not very convenient.

And for those who want to build an universal app an "universal" option in the 
standalone settings would be great.

And btw why did this option exist in previous LC versions for an Universal app 
with PPC and Intel support?


Regards,
Matthias






> The idea of universal binaries is to ensure that a single app/installer can 
> be shipped to users and that will then use the 'best' it can for their 
> machine. They provide a much better end-user experience than Windows or Linux 
> provide in this regard.
> 
> Whilst you might not have many users using Apple architecture machines right 
> now, you don't know when they might upgrade, so universal binaries mean that 
> when a user upgrades their machine, their apps they already have (backed up, 
> more than likely, and re-imaged on the new machine) will continue to take 
> advantage of their hardware.
> 
> Warmest Regards,
> 
> Mark.
> 
> P.S. I should point out that Apple architecture support *is* experimental, so 
> its fine to include and seed to users for testing purposes, but I wouldn't 
> include one in final shipping releases just yet.
> 
> P.P.S. That being said, the only Apple architecture related bug we have had 
> reported recently is related to standalone building itself (and is related to 
> macOS High Sierra - 10.13 - and below *not* supported arm64 slices in some of 
> the command-line tools the S/B uses) - and I fully expect the experimental 
> tag to be removed by final release of 10 (and the corresponding 9.6.x 
> maintenance release just after that).
> 
> -- 
> Mark Waddingham ~ [email protected] ~ http://www.livecode.com/
> LiveCode: Everyone can create apps
> 
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> [email protected]
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
> preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

Reply via email to