Hi Jeff, When I was working my use cases would have run into similar issues as you describe. Most of my applications were short lived and were used by either defence contractors or the military themselves. If I had ever tried to supply any application that "phoned home" I would have been asked to leave and never darken their door again.
I suspect that if I used Livecode Create today I would end up having to prove that it was not contacting any remote servers so much so that I doubt that even being accepted as a "special case" by RunRev would cut it with the military security services. Even if the application were allowed then the licensing is complex, for example I was once paid to support the Ten Tors race by designing and writing a database front end to a PostGre database of competitors which was designed to track team members during the two day event. The event is run by the UK Army and the competitors are all teenagers i.e. children. The event is managed from an army camp on Dartmoor where there is no internet. The database front end was installed on something like fifteen computers situated in departments dotted around the camp such as transport and the medical centre. Each department had personal accessing the database as and when they needed to.These people were working shifts over the time of the event. Each department tended to use a single login so I have no idea how the number of users could be tracked. Also the security and privacy issues were massive and there is no way that software that contacted or attempted to contact the cloud would have be allowed. While I'm sure Livecode will say contact us and we will sort something out, the fact is that having to do so just adds additional levels of complexity, friction and cost. I have read and reread the licensing terms along with the updated FAQs but I still have no idea how the example above would have been charged if written in LC Create today. For example my application used a database library, written in Livecode Script and licensed from Andrea Garcia. Does the use of third party libraries cause additional licensing issues? Like you I think now is time to find other hobbies; the Proxxon range of mini tools are interesting and don't have the same licensing issues. best wishes Simon > On 24 Jul 2024, at 21:04, Jeff Reynolds via use-livecode > <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > > I’ve used Livecode since the early days of MetaCard, primarily creating > educational software, educational multimedia cds included with kids books and > a ton of museum exhibits. For me the new create system and licensing looks > pretty untenable, but I realize I’m the odd duck. > > The bulk of my time on these projects was actually content design and > presentation as well as interface design and functionality. Programming time > in live code was a small fraction of the build costs so savings for me for a > more rapid development environment is minimal and would bring in minimal, if > any increased profits. I’m not churning out an app a week, these are much > more robust content driven programs where dealing with the nuances of content > presentation is the 800lb gorilla and requires lots of small program tweaks > as that design is refined during development to get it just right. Each > interface is custom and art rich so auto interface builds adds no savings, > probably only hassles keeping it out of things. > > Being educational also means super slim margins all around. Asking a royalty > payment for just the software system licensing would be a no go with authors > and publishers. If they did, they would say ok we just take that out of your > end then and that would wipe out any profits for me as it would not really > add anything much to my productivity. > > I have no idea of how this new license would work for my exhibit programs as > well. Some are presentation systems that are used by a varying number of > presenters at the institutions, some employees, some volunteers (is a > volunteer a seat?). On the floor the app is used by tens of thousands of > visitors. I also usually write a bunch of small apps for myself, the client, > and the production team to help manage content development and organization > on the project as well as migrate and format the content to go into the > presentation/exhibit app. These apps are used very sporadically and sometimes > by a number of people, sometimes only a few. All these organizations are > usually paid admission, but are non profits. > > Most of my really hard core programming I doubt would be helped by the new > system as that is usually controlling all sorts of devices thru different > interfaces and talking to other computer systems to coordinate a show. The > drivers and programming for this is usually a total dive into obscure command > protocols and interfaces these devices have but are seldom used outside of > with turnkey control equipment. I doubt Create is set up to do this sort of > very odd programming as it’s usually a lot of fiddling and little or no > decent documentation to follow and many times things are just missing or > don’t work in the gear. I’ve had so many equipment features not be flushed > out or broken in their code on release that due to being able to fiddle with > livecode I could figure out workarounds that the manufacturers say should not > work, but they do work and it’s a testament to the versatility of classic to > fiddle away easily to make these workarounds. > > Cloud based or call home features built in to operate the desktop apps is > also a mess in many of my client’s environments as their IT usually blocks > outgoing stuff from the exhibit networks I’m on for a number of, sometimes > unreasonable and unneeded, reasons. When I need it and can get access I > almost always get calls 6 months later something is not working and I find a > new tech has closed the door that I was given or new system upgrades blanked > old settings and permissions. For this reason I just try and avoid them > unless really necessary as it just usually breaks at some point and the > exhibit going down is bad, bad, bad, everyone pissed at me even if not my > fault. > > So I have no idea of how the museum exhibits would be covered under the new > licensing. I’m sure I would get a lot of pushback to get them to pay for seat > subscriptions and if they did they would make me do it and again take it out > of my end without any really real benefit for me and thus lower profits and > paperwork hassles. Would it be a for sale situation where I only have one > sale and pay a royalty on the coding portion of the contract (a lot of my > contract costs are for design stuff not requiring coding)? > > Fortunately for a number of reasons I’m sliding into retirement here so the > last bits will be fine in classic and installed systems fine and I doubt I’ll > do much if any programming in retirement now, I’ve had enough after over the > last 5 decades, it’s now more fun playing with my table saw and model trains. > Sad to see things go down this road, but I understand that’s where the money > is for Livecode to keep in business. I just hope there is some category > created for the oddballs like me to stay with create in the future if they > want to. But I doubt the Create system would work to develop the multimedia > rich applications I do anyway, it’s not a real app or widget (although it > would probably be useful for my little utility apps, but maybe not as they > tend to be odd thing and don’t need to be pretty at all, just work!) and > requires a lot of odd things done in odd ways sometimes. > > Jeff > > > > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
