Hi Craig, I had posted this right (see below) after you in message 21. On reflection, the behaviour makes sense, and so does Mark’s suggestion that I move the main stack’s OpenStack handler to the card script.
Gregory > Hi Mark and Jacqueline, > > The substacks had PreOpenStack handlers that called a library stack and > sometimes emptied out some fields, but what they did not have OpenStack > handlers. The absence of OpenStack handlers appears to have been the problem > because, after the the sub-stack executes its own PreOpenStack, the main > stack, for whatever reason, executes its OpenStack. This, of course, can be > disastrous if the main stack is intended to initialize an app or perhaps > contains sensitive material that should not be revisited! My fix is to > include an OpenStack handler with nothing in it in every sub-stack in order > to trap the message. > > on OpenStack > ? Do nothing > end OpenStack > > > Gregory On Sun, Sep 11, 2011, at 1:00 PM, use-livecode-requ...@lists.runrev.com wrote: > Gregory, do you understand these nuances? Or is my original test, a simple > mainStack/subStack file with a preOpenStack handler in each stack script, > basically what you already have? Write back... > > > > Craig Newman _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
