Hi Mark, I'd have more sympathy for all that if the many QCC reports on the issue had received a response of some sort, even if it was "Sorry guys, we know it's broken but it's not a high enough priority for us to fix right now". Mine never received a response, not sure if any did.
I have several QCC reports that have been sitting in silence for several weeks, plus a submission to have an app accepted into the RunRev store that I sent in weeks ago and have had no response to, not even a denial. That's not the best way to foster good customer relations. Pete lcSQL Software <http://www.lcsql.com> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Mark Wieder <mwie...@ahsoftware.net> wrote: > Alex, Richard- > > Yes, but... three things: > > it wouldn't have the authority of the company behind it, in the way > that the Apple store, etc does > > I don't recall a link from the runrev site to LiveCode Journal, or > it's somewhere out of the way. > > it would look really bad for the company to have this added as Yet > Another Failed Runrev Initiative. (notice that I succeeded in not > mentioning web deployment, on-rev, RevMedia, DreamCard, etc by name) > > -- > -Mark Wieder > mwie...@ahsoftware.net > > > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode > _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
