On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Richmond <richmondmathew...@gmail.com> wrote: > Which is better: ... > 3. To comment intertextually so that comments sit next to > the parts of the previous message they are directly relevant to? > > I favour #3, because, like comments in code/scripting it is easy for a > reader to see to what > a comment refers.
It's not simply favored, but correct. It's even in the RFCs. Top-posting was largely unknown until the eternal september, at which point we couldn't assimilate the newbies fast enough. There are a couple of uncommon exceptions, such as "please review the following", but outside of them, it's not a matter of preference, but correct or incorrect. -- The Hawkins Law Firm Richard E. Hawkins, Esq. (702) 508-8462 hawkinslawf...@gmail.com 3025 S. Maryland Parkway Suite A Las Vegas, NV 89109 _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
