not yet, but going to. I will let you know how it goes. I am planning a corporate deployment, but I might do the chromeBox instead just because of specs on the new chromebooks. The only other option for the kind of sweet spot that this fills is making a liveCD and having diskless workstations.
For the folks who make fun of it, there are some reasons to use this sort of solution: 1) you can airgap your email and browsing from the rest of your network and worry much much less about PEBKAC/EBSAC. Does that mean you need two screens, keyboards, networks? Yep. How many of your users don't already have two screens? Is one of those screens pretty much always in a browser or email client anyway? I get that the extra keyboard and trackpad are annoying, but that's part of the reason why I'm planning to try this - so I can see what happens. 2) your finance department is much less likely to suffer an ugly hack that compromises your bank accounts. Yes, the liveCD is the ideal solution for this, but the Chrome device is still much, much better than a traditional PC. 3) If your organization is already primarily in the cloud, why do you need a traditional computer for those tasks? -- On the first day, God created the heavens and the Earth On the second day, God created the oceans. On the third day, God put the animals on hold for a few hours, and did a little diving. And God said, "This is good." _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode