On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Malte Brill <[email protected]> wrote:
> Even though explicit vars (or strict compile mode in the prefs) is
> considdered to be a major headache by some, I have never looked back since
> I started to make this a prerequisite in all the code my company writes for
> others.
+1!

It adds little extra work, but helps tremendously when debugging or
refactoring.
+1!


On 22/11/2012 22:21, Peter Haworth wrote:
My lousy typing skills have led to several hours of debugging.  Once I
discovered explicitVars, most of the typos are dealt with.
+1!

And, while recompiling scripts with explicitVars on, I found several other
typos that were sitting there waiting to cause grief at some time in the
future.
+1!

On 23/11/2012 15:14, Richard Gaskin wrote:
With explicitVars set to true, all scripts in memory during the session
must have been written with that relatively-recent addition to the language
in mind

Well, "relatively-recent" is... relative, I suppose. I'm not sure when explicitVars was added to to Metatalk - Google shows several mentions of it by Scott Raney in 1997, including a note that it's "SuperCard compatible" - and certainly it was in SuperTalk no later than 1994, but I've no idea whether it was new or whether is was in v1.0 in 1989. So it's true that it might be less than 20 years old!

Ben

_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

Reply via email to