I'm going to venture an educated guess. From all I have heard, Win8 is really 
optimized for touch interfaces. While you CAN use it on a desktop system, there 
do not seem to be any compelling reasons for doing so, over Win7. Steve Jobs 
had it right. Use a touch based OS on a desktop for just an hour, and you will 
see why point and click is the way to go on these systems. 

Desktop apps that need lots of screen real estate or need a lot of processing 
power flourish on large monitor point and click systems, but flounder on touch 
interfaces. Not all apps need the screen real estate or use a lot of resources. 
These do well on tablet touch systems. I do not think tablet/touch OSes are 
replacing desktop systems. I think that the process is more like a 
re-calibration of the equilibrium between what most people have needed all 
along, a simple tablet touch OS, and professional systems that need the power 
and screen real estate to function well. 

Just my 2ยข

Bob


On Jan 8, 2013, at 7:38 AM, Mark Stuart wrote:

> Wow!
> I guess no one is using Windows 8.
> 
> 
> 
> -----
> Regards,
> Mark Stuart


_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

Reply via email to