I'm guessing that like other languages, C++ has packages. That is, a package is a set of Classes (a Class being a set of related functions). If code grows over 20 years it could be that different Classes are put into a package based on the least likeliness to introduce any issues, and not perhaps in the package that made the most sense. Repackaging could mean that the Classes are reorganized to be in packages that make the most sense.
Just guessing though. On Feb 10, 2013, at 3:37 PM, Richmond <[email protected]> wrote: > > But that still doesn't quite explain the 're' of 'repackaged'. _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
