Jacque- Sunday, March 3, 2013, 11:20:38 AM, you wrote:
> Assuming speed isn't an issue either way, any idea which would be more > memory-efficient? No idea. We'd have to know how and when the engine handles garbage collection. If you see significant speed differences in the different methods, then my guess would be the engine making a working copy of the array. But whether it marks the copy as not in use after that or whether it remains in a cache is a mystery, at least until the FOSS release of the engine code. -- -Mark Wieder mwie...@ahsoftware.net _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
