It clearly says one year of updates. They haven't gone the road of Microsoft and Adobe yet.
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Richmond <richmondmathew...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 06/20/2013 10:19 PM, Paul Looney wrote: >> >> On Jun 20, 2013, at 12:15 PM, Richmond wrote: >> >>> On 06/20/2013 09:57 PM, Paul Looney wrote: >>>> >>>> On Jun 20, 2013, at 11:37 AM, Richmond wrote: >>>> >>>>> But, maybe, just maybe, the idea of getting a year's use of Livecode >>>>> for >>>>> 500 bucks ... is a load of nonsense, and maybe, just maybe, end-users >>>>> would be prepared to stump up 500 bucks (or somesuch) for a version >>>>> that did not expire but had not upgrades built in, >>>>> instead. >>>> >>>> Yes! >>>> One year of upgrades - but the version does not expire - ever. >>> >>> OK: I am extremely happy to find that I am wrong in this case. >>> >>> Richmond. >> >> I'm not saying you are wrong. > > > Blast! > > >> I'm saying how I think it "should" be. >> Glad you brought up the point; I agree that RunRev is doing themselves a >> disservice with the new policy. >> Paul Looney >> _______________________________________________ >> use-livecode mailing list >> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com >> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your >> subscription preferences: >> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode > > > > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode -- http://www.bluewatermaritime.com _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode