I'm not sure how it's done exactly. Mark Waddingham mentioned it to me at the last conference, he just said it was no longer possible to read the code from memory.
I didn't even ask what version but I got the impression it was a recent change. Richard Gaskin <ambassa...@fourthworld.com> wrote: >J. Landman Gay wrote: >> BTW, RR recently removed the ability to see scripts in a memory dump. >:) > >Which version? > >The implications are interesting: does it make things faster or >slower? > >If they're only saving a tokenized form of the script that would seem >likely to make things faster, as it would obviate some of the steps >needed for execution. > >But if they're merely encrypting the scripts at runtime, that would of >course slow things down. > >If the former, how much more could be done to further approach true >machine-code speeds? > >-- > Richard Gaskin > Fourth World > LiveCode training and consulting: http://www.fourthworld.com > Webzine for LiveCode developers: http://www.LiveCodeJournal.com > Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/FourthWorldSys > >_______________________________________________ >use-livecode mailing list >use-livecode@lists.runrev.com >Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your >subscription preferences: >http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode -- Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
