On 8/9/13 1:41 PM, Devin Asay wrote:
On Aug 9, 2013, at 12:22 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
On 8/9/13 1:06 PM, Geoff Canyon wrote:
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Devin Asay <[email protected]> wrote:
On Aug 8, 2013, at 5:25 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
On 8/8/13 6:13 PM, Monte Goulding wrote:
Are you saying that implementing "this me" wasn't one of those times?
It was a very clever ploy to force us all to have this discussion I
think ;-)
You want to know what's really weird? The more we talk about this, the
more sense "this me" makes. Wait. I never said that.
Well, this me thinks this me is weird. But that's just me. This one, not
another one.
Devin
Well, if you (Devin) had Jacque set as your behavior, then for you, "me"
would think "this me" is weird syntax, but "this me" would think "this me"
makes sense. Actually, that doesn't follow the rules of the language. I
worked hard on it, so I'll send it anyway.
I want to be his behavior. Then I can sit here inert, while Devin does all my
work for this me.
No, the behavior does all the work.
set the this me of me to the this me of Jacque
Oh right. This me got confused. We can't have this me doing all the work.
I was telling The Husband about the naming debate and he suggested that
since we're talking about parent scripts, we replace "this me" with
"mama me".
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | [email protected]
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
