Thanks Monte. I noticed the IDE props (the ones beginning with "rev" I think).
Will be interesting to see how things shape up after the parser rewrite. Pete lcSQL Software <http://www.lcsql.com> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Monte Goulding <[email protected] > wrote: > On 27/08/2013, at 7:46 AM, Peter Haworth <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Here's the list of entries in propertynames that have no matching entry > in > > the dictionary. There's quite a few understandable omissions such as > > "abbrev", "english","system"(why are they in the propertynames?). Maybe > I > > should put this into a QCC report? > > > The current implementation of the propertyNames is heavily integrated into > the parser so I think what you are seeing is the result of using > workarounds to get the desired syntax. I suspect that the engine treats > abbrev as a property then looks ahead to find out what it's abbrev of... > Given that script parsing is changing significantly in the near future I'd > hazard a guess that this might get a cleanup. > > There's also quite a few IDE only properties in the list which should > probably be documented separately rather than in the regular dictionary. > However, given the engine itself is virtually undocumented it wouldn't > surprise me it that never happens... > > Chers > > -- > Monte Goulding > > M E R Goulding - software development services > mergExt - There's an external for that! > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > [email protected] > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode > _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
