On 26/04/14 21:50, Dr. Hawkins wrote:
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Richmond <[email protected]>wrote:
Frankly; if you don't want anybody extracting text from your exported
files you might be better
exporting them as image files ??????
Those get big, fast. We have a 3mb limit per file, and 90 page petitions
aren't that rare . . . plus the searchable file is nice . . . Plus they're
making noises about mandatory pdf/A, and . . .
It's not so much that *I* don't want the searching to occur, but that the
*court* doesn't fix/flatten whatever when it filestamps things (with one of
the local trustees' new pdf documents, if I open in preview, I get the
court stamp on the "need Acrobat latest & greatest" message, while with
acrobat/acroreader, I get the document with no stamp . . . pdf is an
abomination).
I'm being a bit goofy: I don't quite understand what you mean by:
*court*
or the court stamp.
Would I be correct in thinking that the court stamp might be a
transparent image of
the court's seal overlaid on a text?
If that is what you want, then surely the thing might be to group the
seal image over the text field
and then export the whole thing as a PDF: therefore getting a text with
stamp overlaid and
unselectable text all in one.
Richmond.
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
