Richard Gaskin wrote > What do you mean by "portable"? > Servers run many services, LiveCode being just one. > They also need DNS. So using LC Server under Apache > at a Web host seems a good way to go, no? > > Besides, neither mchttpd nor any other standalone > will do quite what LC Server does in terms of mixing > HTML with executable LiveCode. The merge function > available to standalones is quite different from the one > called implicitly in Server (no control structures, for example). > > mchttd can be a good solution for providing specialized > services, but for integration with publicly accessible > servers LC Server is the way to go.
Then, mchttpd could work as new starting point for this shelved project: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Looking-for-volunteers-to-create-Wikipedia-on-CD-application-td1288518.html (Some days, I feel sad, really sad about the current state of teacher's mental development in the place where I live... but hope still remains. What I would do when it's gone?) :-( Al -- View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Does-exists-LiveCode-Server-Portable-tp4679431p4679502.html Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
