On 1/10/2015 1:47 PM, Peter Haworth wrote:
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 11:18 AM, J. Landman Gay <[email protected]>
wrote:

When you refer to a stack that way, it is placed in RAM but is not
officially "opened" per se, there are no messages sent to it, and it is not
in the message hierarchy.


Didn't know that, useful.  Do such stacks show up in things like
openStacks,revLoadedStacks?

You'd have to check the "rev" stuff. The stack isn't in the openstacks but it is in the mainstacks. And "there is a stack <short name>" returns true.

The stack behaves like any stack with destroystack set to false, after it has been closed. If it's important that it not be in RAM, the script needs to delete it.

--
Jacqueline Landman Gay         |     [email protected]
HyperActive Software           |     http://www.hyperactivesw.com

_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

Reply via email to