Now that make no sense :) On 17 July 2015 at 19:17, Roger Eller <roger.e.el...@sealedair.com> wrote:
> I have also found that toggling the blendLevel from 100 to 0 is very quick > and efficient, compared to hide/show. > > ~Roger > > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Scott Rossi <sc...@tactilemedia.com> > wrote: > > > In addition to the wait(/send?) options proposed, you might consider > > displaying your animation more efficiently. Showing an image and hiding > > another requires two steps and is inefficient. You can use a transparent > > button to display your "frames" by setting the icon property of the > button > > to the ID of each of your images in succession, without having to hide > any > > image. Plus it's much easier to move the animation around the card since > > you only need to move the button and don't need to concern yourself with > > the locations of the images. > > > > Regards, > > > > Scott Rossi > > Creative Director > > Tactile Media UX/UI Design > > > > > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode > _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode