On 12/10/2015 15:24, dunb...@aol.com wrote:
I made a test between the "sort" method and the "repeat for each". For a list of about
100,000 items, sort finds the max value in 33 ticks, and "repeat" takes 50 ticks.
This seems logical to me, since lower level operations are used in "sort" as opposed to
"repeat" even though we all know how fast "repeat for each" is.
That's really surprising! Could you please share your test stack so I
can have a play?
Peter
--
Dr Peter Brett <peter.br...@livecode.com>
LiveCode Open Source Team
LiveCode on reddit: https://reddit.com/r/livecode
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
