On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Richard Gaskin <ambassa...@fourthworld.com> wrote:
> Geoff Canyon wrote: > > I wasn't defending Navigator specifically, just pointing out that, > > in my experience, the current framework allows for reasonably clean > > development of tools. > > In the case of RevNavigator even more so: your tool politely checks for > the existence of revMenubar when it inits, and if it doesn't find one it > inserts a slender frontScript to provide the handful of handlers it relies > on. This allows it to be enjoyed in the MetaCard IDE or even OpenCard > along with the LiveCode IDE and conceivably any other, all fully > self-contained, nimble, and (at least in my experience having used it in > two different IDEs) error-free. Wow, check me out. I hope I haven't broken that behavior with my recent round of updates. I'll check. gc _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
